On
facebook, Thierry Uwamahoro and Ketty N. continue reacting on CharlesOnyango-Obbo’s article.
“Thanks Katty N. “What bothered me … in
your post too, is the suggestion that journalists can no longer do their jobs.”
I can’t figure out where I said that. I saw that somebody responded on the blog
and pretty much said what I would have said.
You know media
coverage is something that can be quantified. I haven’t seen anyone with data
proving that what Obbo said that Burundi is ignored or goes unnoticed is not
true.
Do we need to be
famous? I don’t know. All I know is that we definitely need to be known as a
country ripe and ready for investments, a country of tech-savvy innovators, a
country of thought leadership, a country of hard working people, a country with
innovative health care systems, etc … but, we will not be known for all these
things if we are not even known in the first place. We will not be known if we
are somehow ignored and left unnoticed. Many might argue that we are already
all that above; but it doesn’t matter if we are already all that if it is not
known (Again, not to belittle the point, Burundi Inc cannot be angry at its
potential customers for not knowing its products). And being mad at those who
tell us the truth will not change that. So, we need some smart leadership and
individual actions to get there (to the little global exposure so that
investors can find us as Melise said). Let’s keep up the good work”.
“Thierry, i think this might be a case
of the egg and the hen...
My point is that
real EAC journalists should be able to research and write on Burundi,
regardless of how well known we are. Why? Because they are journalists. Not
average citizens. Their job description is to dig. I reacted to Obbo's piece
the way many of us react to western media's reports on Africa (starving kids
with swollen bellies). There is no effort from media professionals to cover the
country as well as they do in the rest of the region. part of that is because
they have so few correspondents here. So I’m really not talking about the
average citizen, potential investors, etc... I was specifically addressing the
journalistic problem.
So again what
bothered me in ur piece (which i actually like very much) is when you say that
Rwanda gets more media coverage because it is more maketing-smart. I'm not
talking about people on the street knowing about Rwanda. I'm talking
professional articles, interviews, reports in the media. Of course it's the
case, but is it right? Obbo says 'Burundi only appears when the regional media
go the extra kilometre to cover it". Is it normal for journalists to wait
for us to promote our country to do their job? Isn't "going an extra
kilometre" part of the journalist's job description? That was my point.
Now whether we as a
people need to take back and own our narrative is another question altogether.
of course i agree. In fact i have been doing it every week through a literary
club i co-founded, through publishing anthologies and promoting writers,... My
personal approach is art & culture, which i believe is one of the most
powerful tools to get our stories to the world. And a lot is happening already.
Someone else does it through sports, entrepreneurship, science, or simply
blogging. But let's not kid ourselves, people cannot substitute a well governed
state.
In a nutshell, i am
actually not that mad at Obbo, some of what he says is true, we bear a big
responsibility, but that does not excuse the regional media from doing their
job. And something in me will always instinctively stand up when my country is
attacked, whether it's for the wrong or right reasons. Maybe it's just blind
patriotism, but i could not bring myself to let that article pass... Cheers
mate, and hope to meet u sometime - again, loved ur writing!”
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire